Blog

Week 6 History of Research Ethics Discussion

Description

Week 6 Discussion
No unread replies.No replies.

Respond to the following prompts:

How has learning about the history of research ethics impacted your view of biomedical research?
In looking at the studies you reviewed for your PICOT question, do you feel that today’s researchers adequately protect the rights of human subjects? If not, what additional measures do you recommend?

Criteria
Ratings
Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Course KnowledgeAnswers the initial discussion question(s)/topic(s), demonstrating knowledge and understanding of the concepts for the week.

15.0 pts
Excellent
Addresses all aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding.

14.0 pts
Very Good
Addresses most aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding

12.0 pts
Satisfactory
Addresses some aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding.

8.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Addresses some aspects of the initial discussion question with little depth and lack of application of experiences, knowledge, or understanding.

0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Does not address the initial question(s).

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEngagement in Meaningful Dialogue With Peers and FacultyThe student responds to a student peer and course faculty to further dialogue.

10.0 pts
Excellent
Responds to a student peer AND course faculty furthering the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion.

9.0 pts
Very Good
Responds to a student peer AND course faculty furthering the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion.

8.0 pts
Satisfactory
Responds to a student peer and/or course faculty, adding minimal depth to the discussion.

5.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Responds to a student peer or course faculty, adding minimal depth to the discussion.

0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
No response post to another student or course faculty.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntegration of EvidenceAssigned readings OR online lesson AND at least one outside scholarly source are included. The scholarly source is:1) evidence-based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years.

15.0 pts
Excellent
Integrates evidence from: • assigned readings OR online lessons AND • at least one outside scholarly source. Sources are credited.*

14.0 pts
Very Good
Integrates evidence from: • no assigned readings OR online lesson is included • at least one outside scholarly source is included. Sources are credited.*

12.0 pts
Satisfactory
Integrates evidence from: • assigned readings OR online lesson • no outside scholarly source is included. Sources are credited.*

8.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Integrates evidence from: • assigned readings OR online lesson • no outside scholarly source is included. Sources are not credited.*

0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Does not integrate any evidence.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Communication

5.0 pts
Excellent
Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (0–1 error in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

4.0 pts
Very Good
Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (2–3 errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

3.0 pts
Satisfactory
Presents information using understandable language; information is not organized (3–4 errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

2.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Presents information using understandable language; information is not organized (5-6 errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Presents information that is not clear, logical, professional, or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the post (7 or more errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation).

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReference Citation

5.0 pts
Excellent
References have complete information as required by APA (0-1 errors). In-text citations included for all references, AND references are included for all in-text citations (0 errors).

4.0 pts
Very Good
References have most information as required by APA (2 errors). In-text citations included for all references, AND references are included for all in-text citations (0 errors).

3.0 pts
Satisfactory
References have some information as required by APA (3 errors). In-text citations included for all references, AND references are included for all in-text citations (0 errors).

2.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
References have some information as required by APA (4 errors). In-text citations included for all references AND references are included for all in-text citations (0 errors).

0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
References missing 5 or more elements AND/OR In-text citations missing OR final references not included for in-text citations.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Penalty Deductions

0.0 pts
0 Points Deducted
A 5% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Wednesday, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0)

0.0 pts
2.5 Points Deducted

0.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTotal Participation Responses

0.0 pts
0 Points Deducted
A 5% penalty will be imposed for not entering at least THREE posts on the minimum of TWO separate days. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0)

0.0 pts
2.5 Points Deducted

0.0 pts

Total Points: 50.0

Place your order now for a similar assignment, and have writers from our team of experts write it for you, guaranteeing you an A+