Wilmington University Week 6 Transparency of Health Costs Discussion
Description
Analysis paper: Describe in your own words the goals and objectives of price and quality transparency for consumers seeking health care. Select one of the consumer facing websites found in NCSLs Transparency of Health Costs: State Actions. Analyze whether the website meets the goals and objectives you describe. Discuss areas on the site where you found it lacking or exceeding expectations.
Resources:
Transparency of Health Costs: State Actions (Links to an external site.)
Toward quality transparency in healthcare: Exploring hospital-operated online physician review systems in northeastern United States (Links to an external site.)
Hospital Price Transparency: Making It Useful for Patients (Links to an external site.)
Price Transparency: Common Definitions (Links to an external site.)
Rubric
Analysis Paper on Transparency of HC Costs Rubric
Analysis Paper on Transparency of HC Costs Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePreparation
25.0 to >23.0 pts
Distinguished
Paper demonstrates evidence of thorough preparation through reading or reflection.
23.0 to >20.75 pts
Proficient
Paper demonstrates good evidence of preparation through reading or reflection.
20.75 to >18.75 pts
Satisfactory
Paper demonstrates some evidence of preparation through reading or reflection.
18.75 to >16.25 pts
Marginal
Paper demonstrates little evidence of preparation through reading or reflection.
16.25 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Paper demonstrates no evidence of preparation through reading or reflection.
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality and Depth of content
25.0 to >23.0 pts
Distinguished
Paper contains substantial information, the focus question(s) are answered completely. There is significant discussion of the policy.
23.0 to >20.75 pts
Proficient
Paper contains significant information, the focus question(s are answered thoroughly. The topic is discussed in depth.
20.75 to >18.75 pts
Satisfactory
Paper contains some relevant information, the focus question(s) are answered satisfactorily and in sufficient depth .
18.75 to >16.25 pts
Marginal
Paper contains minimal information, the focus question(s) are answered weakly. The depth of the topic discussion is emerging.
16.25 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Paper is insufficient in its information and/or the focus question(s) are not addressed.
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of Website
25.0 to >23.0 pts
Distinguished
Website Analysis is exemplary in its description, and assessment goals, objectives, and expectations.
23.0 to >20.75 pts
Proficient
Website Analysis is proficient in its description, and assessment goals, objectives, and expectations.
20.75 to >18.75 pts
Satisfactory
Website Analysis is satisfactory in its description, and assessment goals, objectives, and expectations.
18.75 to >16.25 pts
Marginal
Website Analysis is emerging in its description, and assessment goals, objectives, and expectations.
16.25 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Website Analysis is inadequate in its description, and assessment goals, objectives, and expectations.
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting/APA
25.0 to >23.0 pts
Distinguished
Writing/APA is distinguished with no errors.
23.0 to >20.75 pts
Proficient
Writing/APA is proficient with rare errors.
20.75 to >18.75 pts
Satisfactory
Writing /APA is satisfactory with few errors.
18.75 to >16.25 pts
Marginal
Writing/APA is emerging with several errors
16.25 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Writing /APA is unsatisfactory with multiple errors
25.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0
One Page Length
Place your order now for a similar assignment, and have writers from our team of experts write it for you, guaranteeing you an A+