CSU Community Health Issues Heart Disease Policy Development Presentation

CSU Community Health Issues Heart Disease Policy Development Presentation

Description

Identify a public health issue in your community. Imagine you are the president/chief executive officer (CEO) of a public health organization (make sure to create an imaginative name for your organization and to imagine the name of your initiative or intervention). Create a PowerPoint (PPT) presentation that would incorporate your organization and the initiative for the community you have chosen.

Explain the role of your community and constituency engagement in this initiative or intervention as well as policy development for the public health issue identified.
Provide an explanation of the use of performance measures and standards in public health practice and policy development for the initiative or intervention.
Explain what challenges your public health leaders will face in their management of community and constituency engagement and how that might influence policy development initiatives.
Address how your public health leaders and managers would manage performance challenges at the many different levels of the public health system.

Unit VI PowerPoint Presentation Grading Rubric

Criteria
Achievement Level

Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
Level 5

Content(60 points)

0 – 35
Missing required content or content requires significant rework. Presentation repeats other people’s ideas and/or graphics and shows very little attempt at original thought. Topic of presentation may be mostly unclear and/or undeveloped.

36 – 41
All required content is present but not adequately represented. Presentation shows an attempt at originality and inventiveness on a few slides. Analysis and development of topic may sometimes be confusing or unclear.

42 – 47
All required content is present and adequately represented. Presentation shows some originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in an interesting way. Demonstrates a fairly clear analysis and development of topic.

48 – 53
All required content is present and well represented. Presentation is mostly original and inventive. Much of the content and ideas are presented in a unique and interesting way. Demonstrates clear analysis and development of topic.

54 – 60
All required content is present and very well represented. Presentation shows originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in a unique and interesting way. Demonstrates thorough analysis and development of topic.

Organization
(10 points)

0 – 5
The organization is hard to follow; ideas are not linked together and/or may be fragmented. Lacking any logical grouping of ideas or transitions from one idea to the next.

6 – 6
The organization is mostly unclear and could be arranged in a more logical way. Some ideas are linked together, but some ideas are fragmented. There is little to no grouping of ideas or use of transitions.

7 – 7
The organization is fairly clear, but it could be arranged more logically to better support the proposed solution. Ideas are somewhat grouped together with a few transitions between groups.

8 – 8
The organization results in clarity and presents mostly logically arranged points to support the proposed solution. Ideas are grouped fairly well, and there are transitions throughout the document.

9 – 10
The organization results in clarity and presents logically arranged points to support the proposed solution. Related ideas are well grouped, and transitions between ideas flow smoothly.

Quality of Presentation
(10 points)

0 – 5
Several graphics and/or texts are inappropriate and/or unattractive, and they may often detract from the content of the presentation. Background often makes seeing text difficult and may visually compete with graphics on the page.

6 – 6
A few graphics and/or texts may be unattractive and a few may not seem to support the theme and content of the presentation. Background use is somewhat consistent, appropriate to topic, and generally not distracting.

7 – 7
All of the graphics and/or texts are attractive but some do not seem to support the theme and content of the presentation. Background use is somewhat consistent, appropriate to topic, and generally not distracting.

8 – 8
Most of the graphics and/or texts are appropriate and attractive and support the theme and content of the presentation. Background use is fairly consistent, appropriate to topic, and not distracting.

9 – 10
All graphics and/or texts are appropriate and attractive and support the theme and content of the presentation. Background use is consistent, appropriate to topic, and not distracting.

Citations and Formatting
(10 points)

0 – 5
The majority of sources used are not academically reliable. If in-text citations and references are included, they contain major errors to APA formatting guidelines and several in-text citations are missing references and vice versa.

6 – 6
Some peer-reviewed papers are used along with non-academically reliable sources. Reference entries and in-text citations may somewhat follow APA formatting guidelines; several major errors in in-text citations or references may be present. Some in-text citations are missing references and vice versa.

7 – 7
Most sources used are peer-reviewed papers, though two or more sources are not academically reliable. Reference entries and in-text citations show effort to follow APA formatting guidelines; several errors in in-text citations or references may be present. Most in-text citations are referenced and vice versa.

8 – 8
The number of sources meets any expressed assignment requirements, and all but one source is a peer-reviewed paper. Reference entries and in-text citations follow APA formatting guidelines and are usually correct. All in-text citations are referenced and vice versa.

9 – 10
The number of sources meets or exceeds any expressed assignment requirements. Every source used is peer-reviewed or academic in nature. Reference entries and in-text citations follow APA formatting guidelines and are free of errors. All in-text citations are referenced and vice versa.

Writing Mechanics
(10 points)

0 – 5
Writing lacks clarity and conciseness. Serious problems with sentence structure and grammar. Numerous major or minor errors in punctuation and/or spelling.

6 – 6
Writing lacks clarity or conciseness. Minor problems with sentence structure and some grammatical errors. Several minor errors in punctuation and/or spelling.

7 – 7
Writing is somewhat clear and concise. Sentence structure and grammar are adequate and mostly correct. Few minor errors in punctuation and/or spelling.

8 – 8
Writing is mostly clear and concise. Sentence structure and grammar are strong and mostly correct. Few minor errors in punctuation and/or spelling.

9 – 10
Writing is clear and concise. Sentence structure and grammar are excellent. Correct use of punctuation. No spelling errors.

Place your order now for a similar assignment, and have writers from our team of experts write it for you, guaranteeing you an A+