Blog

Hi,Please find below the article on dividend and questions to answer: Report Information from ProQuestApril 16 2015 20:42John B. Coleman Library Table of contents1. Borrowing for Dividends Raises Worries Document 1 of 1Borrowing for Dividends Raises WorriesAuthor: Rappaport, LizProQuest document linkAbstract:   Sean Maroney, director of investor relations at TransDigm, says the “stability of our business, high profit margins and consistent cash flow” give the company “the ability to support this level of leverage.”  Links: Base URL to Journal Linker:, Click here to order from Interlibrary Loan Illiad Full text: Corrections & AmplificationsDex Media Inc. borrowed money in 2003 to pay a dividend to its private-equity owners, including Carlyle Group and Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe. A Monday Money & Investing article incorrectly identified Dex Media’s private-equity sponsors as Thomas H. Lee Partners, Bain Capital and funds managed by Blackstone Group.(WSJ October 6, 2009)Rock-bottom interest rates and thawed credit markets are emboldening some companies to use bond-sale proceeds to go on the offensive, even if that means rewarding shareholders at the expense of bondholders.The nascent trend is controversial because corporate borrowers are sinking themselves deeper into debt to pay out special dividends, buy back stock or finance acquisitions. While such moves were all the rage during the credit boom, most corporate-bond offerings during the recession have been used to reduce debt or stockpile cash.Eric Felder, global head of credit trading at Barclays Capital, says the lure of low rates and companies’ stables of cash increases “the risk of non-bondholder friendly events.”Last week’s sale of $425 million of bonds by aircraft-parts manufacturer TransDigm Group Inc. is one of the back-to-the-past corporate-bond deals causing concern among some analysts. More than $360 million of the proceeds will be used to pay a special cash dividend to shareholders and management of the Cleveland company.The added debt increased TransDigm’s borrowings to 4.3 times its earnings before interest and taxes, compared with 3.1 times before last week’s deal. The expected dividend of $7.50 to $7.70 a share is equal to nearly all of the net income that TransDigm reported since the end of fiscal 2003, according to Moody’s Investors Service.Moody’s said the dividend “illustrates the company’s aggressive financial policy.” Moody’s gave the new debt a junk rating of B3, even though the ratings firm said TransDigm’s “strong operating performance will enable the company to service the increased debt level.”Sean Maroney, director of investor relations at TransDigm, says the “stability of our business, high profit margins and consistent cash flow” give the company “the ability to support this level of leverage.”Borrowing from bondholders to pay shareholder dividends is “a hallmark of an earlier credit era,” Jeffrey Rosenberg, head of credit strategy at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, wrote in a report Friday. Such deals were popular in 2003 and 2004, the last time the Federal Reserve lowered its benchmark interest rate to historically low levels, keeping it at 1% for more than a year.Companies like Dex Media Inc. took on debt to pay dividends to its private-equity owners, including Thomas H. Lee Partners, Bain Capital and funds managed by Blackstone Group, before taking the companies public. Dex Media filed for bankruptcy earlier this year under a mountain of debt.With the federal-funds rate at 0% for nine months now and confidence returning to the stock and debt markets, investors have been driven to take on more risk. That is flooding the corporate-bond market with cash. Investors poured $43 billion into investment-grade corporate-bond funds in the second quarter and nearly $40 billion in the third quarter — almost double previous peak quarters, according to Lipper AMG Data Services.The wave of buying drove down borrowing costs for the average highly rated corporation to about 5%, according to Merrill, a level not seen since 2005. In the heat of the crisis last October, such rates averaged 9%. Through the end of September, more than 1,000 high-rated companies borrowed a record $860 billion, according to Dealogic.In July, Intel Corp. sold $1.75 billion of convertible bonds, planning to use $1.5 billion of the proceeds to buy back shares. A spokesman for Intel declined to comment.The computer-chip giant has a strong credit rating of single-A, so it doesn’t carry a burdensome debt load. Still, the deal raised eyebrows among some analysts and investors, who say floating debt to buy back stock could become more common as companies regain confidence.And as merger-and-acquisition activity revs up, the cheaper cost of debt compared with equity is tempting companies to use bond sales as a deal-making war chest.Analysts are watching Kraft Foods Inc. in anticipation that the company would finance its proposed purchase of U.K. chocolate, candy and chewing gum maker Cadbury PLC by raising tons of debt. Last month’s unsolicited bid by Kraft was then valued at about $16.7 billion, but it could be weeks before Kraft submits a formal offer.Three major credit-ratings agencies have warned Kraft that they could slash the company’s debt ratings if the company reaches a deal agreement with Cadbury. At the current offering price, Kraft would need to shell out at least $6 billion in cash, much of it likely from the debt markets, according to corporate-bond research firm Gimme Credit.”Kraft is committed to maintaining an investment-grade rating,” a Kraft spokesman said, declining to comment further.So far in 2009, returns to high-grade bond investors are 19%, according to Merrill. “We’ve seen a feeding frenzy” because of low interest rates, says Kathleen Gaffney, portfolio manager at Loomis, Sayles & Co. She sold some bonds recently to take profits from the rally. Loomis Sayles wants to have cash on the sidelines in case the Fed raises rates soon or Treasury bonds sell off. Credit: By Liz Rappaport Subject: Dividends; Stock prices; Private equity; Securities buybacks; Investors; Investments; Convertible bonds; Corporate debtLocation: United States–USClassification: 9190: United States; 3100: Capital & debt managementPublication title: Wall Street Journal,   Eastern editionPages: C.1Publication year: 2009Publication date: Oct 5, 2009Publisher: Dow Jones & Company IncPlace of publication: New York, N.Y.Country of publication: United StatesPublication subject: Business And Economics–Banking And FinanceISSN: 00999660Source type: NewspapersLanguage of publication: EnglishDocument type: NewsProQuest document ID: 399143798Document URL: http://ezproxy.pvamu.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/399143798?accountid=7062Copyright: (c) 2009 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. Reproduced with permission of copyright owner. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.Last updated: 2012-07-10Database: ABI/INFORM CompleteContact ProQuestCopyright © 2015 ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. – Terms and ConditionsQuestions:1. Why are conditions currently favorable for firms to issue debt and pay out the proceeds to stockholders?2. What are dangerous impacts of issuing additional debt mentioned in the article?3. TransDigm used the proceeds of their debt issue to pay a one-time dividend while Intel used the proceeds to repurchase shares. How does a repurchase differ from a one-time dividend? Why do you think the two firms chose different approaches to distributing cash to shareholders?       Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks kind regards….Owanaba